No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ralph Joseph AVENDANO, Jr., Appellant
v.
Ralph Joseph AVENDANO, Jr., Appellant
71-2284.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Mar 10, 1972.
455 F.2d 975
George Haverstick (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant., Lyn I. Goldberg, Asst U. S. Atty. (argued), Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Stephen G. Nelson, Acting Chief, Crim. Div., Douglas G. Hendricks, Howard G. Hendricks, Howard B. Frank, Asst. U. S. Attys., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Chambers, Koelsch, Per Curiam, Wright.
Published
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this case involving two counts related to bank robbery and one count of use of a telephone for false threats is affirmed.
The double jeopardy argument is rejected under Haddad v. United States, 349 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 896, 86 S.Ct. 193, 15 L.Ed. 2d 153 (1965).
We find the evidence quite sufficient.
We find no abuse of discretion in permitting a confederate to testify out of order at the second trial and no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion for new trial.