United States v. Cornelius Frazier, Jr., 463 F.2d 781 (9th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Cornelius Frazier, Jr., 463 F.2d 781 (9th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Cornelius FRAZIER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
71-2717.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jul 12, 1972.
463 F.2d 781
Gene Hatfield, San Mateo, Cal., for appellant., Dwayne Keyes, U. S. Atty., William R. Allen, Thomas Couris, Asst. U. S. Attys., Fresno, Cal., for appellee.
Chambers, Koelsch, Carter.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

We find no abuse of discretion in the failure to grant a continuance.

We also find the evidence on both counts sufficient. On Count I it should be pointed out that the jury did not have to believe the defendant’s testimony that he did not receive the notice to report for induction.

The abatement point offered is foreclosed by our United States v. Westfall, 447 F.2d 1375 (9 Cir. 1971).

The contention that the order to report was punitive is not supported by the record.