Frank James Dennson v. J. F. Tomkins, 464 F.2d 1033 (5th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Frank James Dennson v. J. F. Tomkins, 464 F.2d 1033 (5th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank James DENNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J. F. TOMKINS Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
27875.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 28, 1972.
464 F.2d 1033
Frank James Dennson, pro se., Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. of Fla., Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendants-appellees.
Brown, Goldberg, Morgan.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Frank James Dennson, an inmate of the maximum security section of the Florida State Prison at Raiford, filed a civil rights complaint seeking injunctive relief against asserted deprivations of Federal constitutional rights resulting from his confinement in administrative segregation apart from the general prison population. We vacate the District Court’s order summarily dismissing the complaint and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Williams v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1972, 461 F.2d 1080, and companion cases. [1]

Vacated and remanded.

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se ease summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5 Cir., 1969, 412 F.2d 981.