Hattie Populus Cooper v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., Defendant-Third-Party v. Wm. M. Bekurs, Etc., Third-Party, 469 F.2d 693 (3rd Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
Hattie Populus Cooper v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., Defendant-Third-Party v. Wm. M. Bekurs, Etc., Third-Party, 469 F.2d 693 (3rd Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hattie Populus Cooper
v.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Wm. M. Bekurs, Etc., Third-Party
72-2163.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Dec 7, 1972.
469 F.2d 693
Published

469 F.2d 693

Hattie Populus COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Third-Party
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Wm. M. BEKURS, etc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees.

No, 72-2163 Summary Calendar.[*]

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 7, 1972.

William F. Wessel, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Brock B. Gordon, Mobile, Ala., for Metropolitan.

J. Edward Thornton, Mobile, Ala., for Bekurs.

Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgement is affirmed. Appellee's motion to impose penalties is denied.

*

Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I