Joel J. Tartell v. Chelsea Nat'l Bank, 470 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Joel J. Tartell v. Chelsea Nat'l Bank, 470 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stonehill v. Security National Bank (nysd, 1975-06-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Stonehill v. Security National Bank
S.D.N.Y. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
Daley v. Capitol Bank and Trust Co., 506 F.2d 1375, 1377 (1st Cir.1974); see Tartell v. Chelsea National Bank, 351 F.Supp. 1071, 1076 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 470 F.2d 994 (1972).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Harold Daniels and Irene Daniels
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Tartell v. Chelsea National Bank, 351 F.Supp. 1071, 1079 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 470 F.2d 994 (2d Cir.1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joel J. Tartell
v.
Chelsea National Bank
156.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Nov 15, 1972.
470 F.2d 994
Published

470 F.2d 994

Joel J. TARTELL, Appellant,
v.
CHELSEA NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

No. 156, Docket 72-1665.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 15, 1972.
Decided Nov. 15, 1972.

Harold L. Young, New York City (Young, Sonnenfeld & Busner, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Jerome J. Londin, New York City (Carro, Spanbock & Londin, Kenneth A. Lapatine, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Tyler's opinion below. 351 F.Supp. 1071.