United States v. Pasquale Deyorio D/B/A Hub Bar & Package Store, 473 F.2d 1041 (5th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Pasquale Deyorio D/B/A Hub Bar & Package Store, 473 F.2d 1041 (5th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Baird (caed, 1994-08-31)
Statutes interpreted (leading-cases list)
#2 42 U.S.C. § 2000a(c)(3) cited 1× in this case · 7 total citations of statute
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Baird
E.D. Cal. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Deyorio, 473 F.2d 1041, 1042 (5th Cir.1973) (holding that a bar with mechanical amusement devices was a place of entertainment within the meaning of section 2000a(b)(2)).
discussed Cited "see" Westray v. Porthole, Inc.
D. Maryland · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Deyorio, 473 F.2d 1041, 1042 (5th Cir.1973); (per curiam) (bar and package store); United States v. DeRosier, 473 F.2d 749, 751-52 (5th Cir.1973); United States v. Deetjan, 356 F.Supp. 688 (D.Fla.1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Pasquale DEYORIO D/B/A Hub Bar and Package Store, Defendant-Appellee
72-2240.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 20, 1973.
473 F.2d 1041
John L. Biggs, U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Gerald W. Jones, Peter Mear, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff-appellant., Michael L. Kinney, St. Petersburg, Fla., for defendant-appellee.
Thornberry, Coleman, Ingraham.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (1)
PER CURIAM:

Like United States v. DeRosier, 473 F.2d 749 (5th Cir., 1973), the question involved on this appeal is whether the Hub Bar and Package Store is a “place of entertainment” within the meaning of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a et seq., by virtue of the business revenue derived from certain mechanical amusement devices located on its premises.

The district court relying on the district court’s decision in United States v. DeRosier, 332 F.Supp. 316 (S.D.Fla., 1971), dismissed the complaint of the United States. We reverse for the reasons stated in our reversal of DeRosier, supra.

Taking the allegations in plaintiff’s complaint as true, as is the rule, Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1955), the United States has stated an actionable complaint against the Hub Bar & Package Store. It remains for ultimate determination whether the Hub Bar affects interstate commerce within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. § 2000a(c)(3). Cf. Evans v. Seaman, 452 F.2d 749 (5th Cir., 1972).

The judgment of the district court is reversed and remanded for trial upon the merits of the case.