green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Austin
United States v. Sarvis, 523 F.2d 1177 , 1182 n. 2 (D.C.Cir.1975); United States v. Brown, 483 F.2d 1314 , 1315 n. 4, 1318-19 (D.C.Cir.1973); United States v. Jones, 476 F.2d 883, 884, 886-87 (D.C.Cir., 1972) (Bazelon, L, dissenting); United States v. Stanley, 469 F.2d 576 , 579 n. 7 (D.C.Cir.1972); United States v. Thompson, 452 F.2d 1333 , 1335 n. 4 (D.C.Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 405 U.S. 998 , 92 S.Ct. 1251 , 31 L.Ed.2d 467 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Wilbur JONES, Appellant
v.
Wilbur JONES, Appellant
72-1479.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Nov 28, 1972.
Bazelon, Tamm, Leventhal.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
[*884] ORDER
PER CURIAM.On consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file a non-conforming pleading, it is
Ordered by the Court that the motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to file appellant’s lodged motion for release on non-financial conditions pending appeal, and appellee's lodged opposition thereto. On consideration of the foregoing, it is
Further ordered by the Court that appellant’s aforesaid motion for release on non-financial conditions is denied.
Chief Judge BAZELON would grant the motion for release on non-financial conditions pending appeal and may file an opinion at a later date.