United States v. Roscoe Lee Farmer, in Re Lawrence Marquette, Esq, 476 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
United States v. Roscoe Lee Farmer, in Re Lawrence Marquette, Esq, 476 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roscoe Lee FARMER, Defendant-Appellant. in Re Lawrence MARQUETTE, Esq.
72-2696.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 13, 1973.
476 F.2d 996
Lawrence Marquette (present, order to show cause), Sausalito, Cal., for defendant-appellant., Janet Aitken, Asst. U. S. Atty. (appeared, order to show cause), James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Chambers, Trask, Conti.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

It is the ORDER of this court that Attorney Lawrence Marquette is relieved as counsel in the above appeal.

For failure to prosecute the appeal with due diligence, Attorney Lawrence Marquette is assessed a penalty of $779.-40 in accordance with the provisions of Rule 46(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, this sum being the amount paid by the government for preparation of the reporter’s transcript on appeal.

The said sum shall be paid into the registry of the clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California within eight weeks from the filing of this order.