Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Savvides (Maria)
(2×)
In the circumstances, it is highly unlikely that defendant, if granted a hearing, could make the requisite showing that she was prejudiced by the plea court's failure to warn her of the possibility of deportation ( see People v Olmedo , supra ; People v Fernandez , 143 AD3d 505 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 1123 [2016],quoting People v Diakite , 135 AD3d 533, 533 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1131 [2016]).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Fernandez
In any event, “the circumstances of the plea render it highly unlikely that defendant could make the requisite showing of prejudice under Peque if granted a hearing” (Diakite, 135 AD3d at 533 [citation omitted]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Board of Directors of Windsor Owners Corp., Respondent,
v.
Elaine Platt, Appellant
v.
Elaine Platt, Appellant
16657 155985/14.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 14, 2016.
Published
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Peter H. Moulton, J.), entered May 5, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s motion for leave to renew her motion to dismiss the claim for consequential damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The new facts offered by defendant on her renewal motion would not change the prior determination (see CPLR 2221 [e] [2]). The mere fact that the plaintiff in a related federal action chose not to depose defendant does not support defendant’s theory that her disclosure of attorney-client communications will not play a role in the determination of that action or a state action brought by the same plaintiff. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.