Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lord Indus., Inc., 498 F.2d 1342 (6th Cir. 1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lord Indus., Inc., 498 F.2d 1342 (6th Cir. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
LORD INDUSTRIES, INC., Respondent
74-1128.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jun 28, 1974.
498 F.2d 1342
Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Thomas A. Woodley, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., on brief, for petitioner., Cross, Wrock, Miller & Vieson, William A. Coughlin, Jr., Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondent.
Weick, Peck, McCree.
Published

ORDER

On consideration of the application for enforcement, the record, and arguments and briefs of counsel, we are of the opinion that there is substantial evidence to support the order of the Board, reported at 207 NLRB No. 69, which found that Respondent had violated Sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Act.

It is therefore ordered that enforcement be granted and that the mandate of the Court issue forthwith.

In view of this disposition of the case we find it unnecessary for us to pass upon the motion for a protective order.