Wolf v. State, 111 So. 320 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927). · Go Syfert
Search
Wolf v. State, 111 So. 320 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wolf
v.
State.
7 Div. 341..
Alabama Court of Appeals.
Feb 1, 1927.
111 So. 320
Frank B. Embry, of Pell City, for appellant. There is no adjudication by the court of defendant's guilt, based upon the verdict of the jury, and the judgment is erroneous. Wells v. State, 19 Ala. App. 403 , 97 So. 681 ; White v. State, 18 Ala. App. 50 , 88 So. 451 ; McMahan v. State, ante, p. 522, 109 So. 553 . Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State. Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.
Rice.
Published
RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of distilling prohibited liquors, etc.

Where it appears that there was a regular finding of guilt by the jury, followed by an appropriate sentence by the court, a proper adjudication of guilt will, upon appeal, be presumed.

All facts and circumstances constituting a part of the res gesta of the alleged offense are properly allowed to go in evidence.

Thefe is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.