Pruden v. United States, 511 F.2d 1398 (4th Cir. 1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Pruden v. United States, 511 F.2d 1398 (4th Cir. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“all disputes . . . as to whether . . shipments conform to the terms of the sale, except as to quality, or the amount of the allowance or interpretation of any section of these rules, . . " held: acts of god "well within the scope of the arbitration clause . . . .”
33 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Griffin v. Semperit of America, Inc. (txsd, 1976-06-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Griffin v. Semperit of America, Inc.
S.D. Tex. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
all disputes . . . as to whether . . shipments conform to the terms of the sale, except as to quality, or the amount of the allowance or interpretation of any section of these rules, . . " held: acts of god "well within the scope of the arbitration clause . . . .
cited Cited "see" Brotko Ex Rel. Brotko v. United States
D.R.I. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
Wilson v. United States, 315 F.Supp. 1197, 1199-2000 (E.D.Pa.1970); see Pruden v. United States, 399 F.Supp. 22, 27 (E.D.N.C.1974), aff 'd, 511 F.2d 1398 (4th Cir.1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thurmon v. Sellers
Tenn. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pruden v. United States, 399 F.Supp. 22, 25, 26 (E.D.N.C.1973), aff’d, 511 F.2d 1398 (4th Cir.1975) (Two factors are key in situations involving "on call" employees, namely, the amount of control the employer has over the employee at the time of the act and whether the employer’s business was being substantially furthered at the time of the accident); Connell v. Carl’s Air Conditioning, 97 Nev. 436 , 634 P.2d 673, 674-75 (1981) (holding that the employer was not liable for negligence of 24-hour "on call” employee who was not called for duty and whose after hour activities were…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Marion Manufacturing Company v. W. B. Long, D/B/A W. B. Long Company, and Robert Manning, Jr., D/B/A Webb Cotton Company
6th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Long v. Marion Manufacturing Co., 402 F.Supp. 69, 70 (D.S.C.1974), aff'd, 511 F.2d 1398 (4th Cir. 1975). 2 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pruden
v.
United States
74-1936.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Mar 17, 1975.
511 F.2d 1398
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 86%
Citer courts: S.D. Texas (1)

511 F.2d 1398

Pruden
v.
U. S.

74-1936

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit

3/17/75

1

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED