Mauldin v. Weinberger, 519 F.2d 1399 (4th Cir. 1975). · Go Syfert
Mauldin v. Weinberger, 519 F.2d 1399 (4th Cir. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) U.S. D.I.D. Corp. v. Windstream Communications, Inc.
2d Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
Md. 1974) 5 (“[U]nder the principle of ‘restitution’ a party who obtains benefits 6 from an improperly issued injunction, that he would not have 7 received but for the injunction, has a duty to restore that benefit to 8 those who have been injured by the injunction.”), aff’d, 519 F.2d 1399 9 (4th Cir. 1975); see also 11A Wright & Miller § 2973 (noting, in the 10 context of Rule 65.1 bonds, that “the bond covers incidental and 11 consequential costs and either the losses the unjustly restrained 12 party has suffered while wrongfully being prohibited from engaging 13 in certain acti…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mauldin
v.
Weinberger
74-1931.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 23, 1975.
519 F.2d 1399
Published

519 F.2d 1399

Mauldin
v.
Weinberger

74-1931

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit

4/23/75

1

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED