neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dr. Helen BRUCE Et Al., Appellants,
v.
R. Elliott SCEARCE Et Al., Appellees
v.
R. Elliott SCEARCE Et Al., Appellees
75-1225.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Sep 16, 1975.
Eugene K. Buckley, St. Louis, Mo., for appellants., Eugene P. Walsh, Clayton, Mo., for ap-pellees.
Heaney, Stephenson, Smith.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM.
Upon a careful consideration of the record and of the briefs and arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the District Court in Bruce v. Scearce, 390 F.Supp. 297 (E.D.Mo.1975), is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the trial court’s opinion.