Gulf Power Co. v. Illinois-Florida Land Co., 132 So. 109 (Fla. 1931). · Go Syfert
Search
Gulf Power Co. v. Illinois-Florida Land Co., 132 So. 109 (Fla. 1931). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mendes v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (fladistctapp, 2025-01-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Mendes v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · confidence medium
We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings without expressing "any opinion as to the extent of the error." Pederson v. Suntrust Mortg., Inc., 145 So. 3d 996, 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (quoting Gulf Power Co. v. Ill.-Fla. Land Co., 132 So. 109, 110 (Fla. 1931)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Connie Pederson a/k/a Connie L. Pederson v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2014 · confidence medium
We do not express “any opinion as to the extent of the error.” Gulf Power Co. v. Illinois-Florida Land Co., 132 So. 109,110 (Fla.1931).
discussed Cited "see" Evans v. Green (2×)
Fla. · 1939 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gulf Power Co. v. Illinois-Florida Land Co., et al., 100 Fla. 1594 , 132 Sou. 109 ; Clark v. Caldwell, 95 Fla. 754 , 115 Sou. 632 ; Cameron v. Baker, Bieb & Schaub Motors, Inc., 96 Fla. 389 , 118 Sou. 423 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gulf Power Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Illinois-Florida Land Company, a Corporation, Gulf Securities Company, Inc., a Corporation, and E. H. Robertson, Doing Business as E. H. Robertson & Company, Defendants in Error
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 5, 1931.
132 So. 109
Carter Yonge, for Plaintiff in Error; T. R. James, for Defendant in Error.
Terrell, Ellis, Brown, Whitfield, Strum, Buford.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
Terrell, C. J.

In this cause, defendants in error have filed a confession of errors and consent that the judgment below be reversed. Plaintiff in error has endorsed the confession of errors and consents that the judgment be reversed.

In this view of the case, our conclusion is to reverse the judgment of the court below upon the "confession of errors” without expressing any opinion as to the extent of the error.- The Judgment of the court below is therefore reversed and the cause remanded for such proceedings as are consistent with the law and rules of practice governing such causes. Clark v. Caldwell, 95 Fla. 754, 116 So. R. 632, Cameron v. Parker, 96 Fla. 389, 118 So. R. 423.

[*1595] Ordered and decreed accordingly.

Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P.. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.