green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Knopfler v. Schraiber (In re Schraiber)
See Gottlieb v. Vaicek, 69 F.R.D. 672, 676 (N.D.Ill.1975) aff'd without opinion, 544 F.2d 523 (7th Cir.1976) (court explained that the stare decisis effect of two limited partners’ lawsuit on unnamed limited partner has been held to be a sufficient practical impairment to make the unnamed partner a person described in Rule 19(a)).
cited
Cited "see"
Burger King Corp. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.
See Gottleib v. Vaicek, 69 F.R.D. 672 (N.D.Ill.1975), aff' d, 544 F.2d 523 (7th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Lopez v. King
Accord, Gottlieb v. Vaicek, 69 F.R.D. 672 (ND Ill.1975) aff’d, 544 F.2d 523 (7th Cir.1976) (adequate alternative remedy factor is most important of the four factors stated in the Rule).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Williams
v.
Williams
76-1278.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
Nov 22, 1976.
544 F.2d 523
Published
U. S.
v.
Williams
No. 76-1278
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
11/22/76
1
N.D.Ill.
MOTION TO STRIKE GRANTED, JUDGMENT AFFIRMED