Pleasant Valley Irrigation Co. v. Lord, 111 P.2d 640 (Idaho 1941). · Go Syfert
Search
Pleasant Valley Irrigation Co. v. Lord, 111 P.2d 640 (Idaho 1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PLEASANT VALLEY IRRIGATION COMPANY, LIMITED, a Corporation, Respondent,
v.
DONALD LORD and OLIVER LORD, Appellants
No. 6801..
Idaho Supreme Court.
Mar 11, 1941.
111 P.2d 640
Elam & Burke and Thomas L. Martin, for Appellants., Davison & Davison and Edwin Snow, for Respondents.
Givens, Budge, Morgan, Holden, Ailshie.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
GIVENS, J.

This action involves respective water rights, claimed by appellant and respondents in Black’s Creek, alias Ten-Mile Creek, conflicting as to priority both in time and amount.

The assignments of error challenge only the findings of fact; thus, issues of fact alone are the essence of the controversy.

The evidence, though conflicting, is sufficient to sustain the findings of fact and the judgment is therefore affirmed. (Evans v. Davidson, 58 Ida. 600, 77 Pac. (2d) 661; In re Randall’s Estate, 58 Ida. 143, 70 Pac. (2d) 389; Eaton v. McWilliams, 52 Ida. 145, 12 Pac. (2d) 259; Walker v. Jackson, 48 Ida. 18, 279 Pac. 293; East [*282] wood v. Standard Mines & Mill. Co., 11 Ida. 195, 81 Pac. 382; McKissick v. Oregon Short Line Ry Co., 13 Ida. 195, 89 Pac. 629; Patrick v. Bisbee, 52 Ida. 369, 15 Pac. (2d) 730; Gordon v. Sunshine Mining Co., 43 Ida. 439, 252 Pac. 870; Lisenby v. Intermountain State Bank, 33 Ida. 101, 190 Pac. 355.)

Costs awarded to respondent.

Budge, C. J., and Morgan, Holden and Ailshie, JJ., concur.