United States v. Gabriel Francis Antelope, 555 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Gabriel Francis Antelope, 555 F.2d 1378 (9th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Gabriel Francis ANTELOPE, Appellant
74-2741.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 20, 1977.
555 F.2d 1378
Allen V. Bowles, Moscow, Idaho, argued for appellant., Gabriel Francis Antelope, pro se., Marion J. Callister, U. S. Atty., Mikel H. Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty., D. Idaho, Boise, Idaho, argued for appellee.
Kilkenny, Choy, Goodwin.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The facts leading up to the appellant’s trial and conviction are stated in our opinion, United States v. Antelope, 523 F.2d 400 (CA9 1975). That decision was reversed by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Antelope,-U.S.-, 97 S.Ct. 1395, 51 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977), and the cause remanded to us for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court opinion.

Inasmuch as the Supreme Court rejected appellant’s sole contention, the judgment of conviction must be affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.