Pennzoil Producing Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 558 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Pennzoil Producing Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 558 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wilkes-Barre Publishing Co. v. Newspaper Guild of Wilkes-Barre, Local 120 (pamd, 1980-06-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Wilkes-Barre Publishing Co. v. Newspaper Guild of Wilkes-Barre, Local 120
M.D. Penn. · 1980 · confidence medium
See, e. g., Teamsters, Local 249 v. Western Pennsylvania Motor Carriers Association, 574 F.2d 783 , 786 n.2 (3d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 828 , 99 S.Ct. 102 , 58 L.Ed.2d 122 (1979); Communications Workers v. Western Electric Co., 397 F.Supp. 1318, 1325 (N.D.Ga.1975), aff’d, 558 F.2d 816 *71 (5th Cir. 1977); Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Local 866, 271 F.Supp. 281, 284-85 (S.D.N.Y.1967), aff’d, 447 F.2d 229 (2d Cir. 1971).
discussed Cited "see" International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 2188 v. Western Electric Company, Incorporated (2×)
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Communications Workers of America v. Western Electric Co., 397 F.Supp. 1318 (N.D.Ga.1975), aff’d 558 F.2d 816 (5 Cir. 1977) where a controversy was submitted to an arbitrator but the parties could not agree, as here, on the specific dispute to be considered by the arbitrator.
cited Cited "see" Aeronautical MacHinists Lodge 709 v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.
N.D. Ga. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Communication Workers v. Western Electric, Inc., supra [ 397 F.Supp. 1318 (N.D.Ga.1975), aff’d, 558 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1977) (per curiam).].
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PENNZOIL PRODUCING COMPANY Et Al., Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent
76-1626, 76-1831, 76-2128.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 1, 1977.
558 F.2d 816
Jeron L. Stevens, Stephen M. Hacker-man, A. Duncan Gray, Jr., Gen. Atty., M. Diane Barber, Atty., Pennzoil Producing Co., Houston, Tex., for petitioners in 76-1626., Paul W. Wright, Martin N. Erck, Ed-munds Travis, Jr., Houston, Tex., amicus curiae, for Exxon Corp., Harry E. Barsh, Jr., Washington, D. C., for State of Louisiana., Allan Abbot Tuttle, Sol., Drexel D. Journey, Gen. Counsel, John H. Burnes, Jr., Atty., F.P.C., Washington, D. C., for respondent., Roy L. Merrill, Houston, Tex., for Mobil Oil Corp., Thomas G. Johnson, William G. Riddoch, Dan A. Bruce, Houston, Tex., for petitioners in 76-1831., William B. Cassin, Gen. Counsel, Phillip D. Endom, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Lee McCarthy Huber, Atty., United Gas Pipe Line Co., Houston, Tex., Donald R. Arnett, Houston, Tex., for petitioners in 76-2128.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion June 6, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 553 F.2d 485)

Before CLARK, RONEY and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In its petition for rehearing, the Federal Power Commission asserts that language in the opinion may erroneously indicate the prejudgment of an issue not before the Court, /. e., the effect of our decision in[*817] Southland Royalty Co. v. FPC, 543 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir. 1976) on a state court termination of a lease, particularly one not limited by a fixed-term.

In order to pull from the opinion any indication as to how Southland might apply to the facts of this case, we delete from our opinion the last two sentences found at the end of the final paragraph, which read as follows:

It may well be that the “present or future public convenience or necessity” will suggest the propriety of abandoning a fraction of the gas in Williams’ property, rather than lose the entire amount from the interstate market. This decision is for the Commission.

We agree with the Commission that the statement was premature, if construed to be decisional, and unnecessary with respect to our decision.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed in the above entitled and numbered cause be and the same is hereby DENIED.