Louis Vernell, Jr. v. United States, 559 F.2d 963 (5th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Louis Vernell, Jr. v. United States, 559 F.2d 963 (5th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Cisneros (txsd, 2006-09-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Cisneros
S.D. Tex. · 2006 · confidence medium
Vernell v. United States, 559 F.2d 963, 964 (5th Cir.1977); Del Genio v. United States, 352 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.1965).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Russell Hobson, Russell Hobson v. United States
11th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
See Kaufman v. U.S., 394 U.S. 217 , 227 n. 8, 89 S.Ct. 1068 , 1074 n. 8, 22 L.Ed.2d 227 (1969); Buckelew v. U.S., 575 F.2d 515, 517-18 (5th Cir.1978); Vernell v. U.S., 559 F.2d 963, 964 (5th Cir.1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007 , 98 S.Ct. 1876 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security Facility
D.C. Cir. · 1986 · confidence medium
E.g., Hardy v. United States, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 162 , 164, 381 F.2d 941, 943 (1967); Chin v. United States, 622 F.2d 1090, 1092 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 353 (1981); United States v. Orejuela, 639 F.2d 1055, 1057 (3d Cir.1981); Vernell v. United States, 559 F.2d 963, 964 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007 , 98 S.Ct. 1876 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978). 33 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Billy G. Byers
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · confidence medium
United States v. Orejuela, 639 F.2d 1055, 1057 (3d Cir.1981) (district court's decision not to relitigate issues already considered on direct appeal reviewable under abuse of discretion standard); Buckelew v. United States, 575 F.2d 515, 517-518 (5th Cir.1978); Vernell v. United States, 559 F.2d 963, 964 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007 , 98 S.Ct. 1876 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Beamon v. State (2×)
Wis. · 1980 · confidence medium
Va. 1975) aff'd. without opinion 532 F.2d 751 (4th Cir. 1976); Vernell v. United States, 559 F.2d 963, 964 (5th Cir. 1977) rehearing denied 564 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1977); Stephan v. United States, 496 F.2d 527, 528-29 (6th Cir. 1974) cert denied 423 U.S. 861 (1975); Escobedo v. United States, 350 F. Supp. 894, 895-96 (N.D.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Nicholas Palumbo
3rd Cir. · 1979 · confidence medium
United States v. Currie, 589 F.2d 993, 994-95 (9th Cir. 1979); Vernell v. United States, 559 F.2d 963, 964 (5th Cir. 1977) (per curiam), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007 , 98 S.Ct. 1876 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978); United States v. Natelli, 553 F.2d 5, 7 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 819 , 98 S.Ct. 59 , 54 L.Ed.2d 75 (1977); Boeckenhaupt v. United States, 537 F.2d 1182, 1183 (4th Cir.) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 863 , 97 S.Ct. 169 , 50 L.Ed.2d 142 (1976); Levine v. United States, 430 F.2d 641, 642-63 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 949 , 91 S.Ct. 962 , 28 L.Ed.2d 232…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hankins v. Bell
N.D. Miss. · 1979 · confidence medium
Vernell v. United States, 559 F.2d 963, 964 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1007 , 98 S.Ct. 1876 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978); Blackwell v. United States, 429 F.2d 514, 516 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Currie, 589 F.2d 994 , 995 (6th Cir. 1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Louis VERNELL, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
76-3929.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 21, 1977.
559 F.2d 963
Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., Marsha L. Lyons, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for respondent-appellee.
Thornberry, Roney, Hill.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
[*964] PER CURIAM:

Louis Vernell appeals from the denial on September 7, 1976, of his Motion for Rehearing and Vacation of an Order dismissing his § 2255 petition. The Motion for Rehearing and Vacation of an Order requests reconsideration of issues which have been raised and reviewed in earlier motions and appeals. Vernell still asks that his conviction be overturned because of the same “newly discovered evidence” which was before this court at the time of his first direct appeal and because of the same perjured testimony and alleged wiretap which was before this court on the appeal from the denial of the motion for a new trial. The grounds raised in the instant § 2255 petition have been previously decided by both the district court and this court in petition for rehearing, motion for new trial, and the direct appeal therefrom. Accordingly, we AFFIRM. See, e.g., Blackwell v. United States, 429 F.2d 514 (5 Cir. 1970); Del Genio v. United States, 352 F.2d 304 (5 Cir. 1965).