Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester, 561 F.2d 1213 (5th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester, 561 F.2d 1213 (5th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
27 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Jonathan Good v. Mary Berghuis (3×) also: Cited "see"
6th Cir. · 2013 · confidence medium
See id. at 1215, 1217 (Edwards, J.) (concluding that the lack of a state court hearing makes federal collateral review available but finding any error harmless); id. at 1217-18 (Phillips, C.J.) (concluding that Powell precluded review); id. at 1218 (Weick, J.) (concluding that Powell precluded review and finding any error at any rate harmless).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Ross
D.D.C. · 2011 · confidence medium
Thus, “Congress’s delegation to the Attorney General to determine the retroactive applicability of SORNA is well within the limits of possible delegation.” United States v. Cotton, 2011 WL 180196, at *17 ; see United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d at 264 (“The delegation to the Attorney General to determine the retroactive applicability of SORNA is well within the limits of permissible delegation.”); United States v. Ambert, 561 F.2d at 1213-14. 2.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Warshak (2×)
6th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bradley v. Cowan, 561 F.2d 1213, 1217 (6th Cir.1977) (noting that the impact of "purely cumulative" evidence is often minimal). [23] That is to say, the federal agents had established probable cause to believe that the targets of the surveillance were a foreign power or agents of a foreign power.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Brooks
6th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bradley v. Cowan, 561 F.2d 1213, 1217 (6th Cir.1977) (finding harmless error where the evidence seized in an unconstitutional search of the defendant’s hotel room was “purely cumulative” of the other evidence of the defendant’s guilt).
discussed Cited "see" Dunn v. Rose (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
M.D. Tenn. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bradley v. Cowan, 561 F.2d 1213 (6th Cir. 1977).
discussed Cited "see" Texports Stevedore Company v. Murl J. Winchester
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alabama Dry Dock and Ship Building Co. v. Kininess, 554 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir. 1977). 561 F.2d at 1213. 7 11 On petition for rehearing en banc, petitioners argue that the panel's assertion that the gear room "adjoined the docks and associated buildings" is factually inaccurate.
discussed Cited "see" Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Alabama Dry Dock and Ship Building Co. v. Kininess, 554 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir. 1977). 561 F.2d at 1213. 7 On petition for rehearing en banc, petitioners argue that the panel’s assertion that the gear room “adjoined the docks and associated buildings” is factually inaccurate.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Texports Stevedore Company, and Texas Employers' Insurance Association
v.
Murl J. Winchester and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of Labor
76-4100.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 16, 1977.
561 F.2d 1213
Published

561 F.2d 1213

TEXPORTS STEVEDORE COMPANY, and Texas Employers' Insurance
Association, Petitioners,
v.
Murl J. WINCHESTER and Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, U. S. Department of Labor,
Respondents.

No. 76-4100.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 16, 1977.

E. D. Vickery, W. Robins Brice, Houston, Tex., for petitioners.

Alfred G. Albert, Act. Sol., Laurie M. Streeter, Assoc. Sol. of Labor, Washington, D.C. (for Director, Office of Workers' Com. Programs), Ronald E. Meisburg, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondents.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 20, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 554 F.2d 245)

Before GOLDBERG, CLARK and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[*~1213]1

The following changes are being made in the opinion as published by withdrawing the next to last paragraph as it appears on page 3915, and substituting therefor the following language:

[*~1215]2

"Respondent's accident did not occur on the dock or pier adjoining the Houston Shipping Channel but at a gear room which, though five blocks away, adjoined the docks and associated buildings. See Alabama Dry Dock and Ship Building Co. v. Kininess, 554 F.2d 176, 178 (5th Cir. 1977)."

[*~1218]3

In all other respects, the Petition for Rehearing is DENIED and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.