neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.5 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ELMIRA SHEARMAN Et Al. vs. WM. W. SHEARMAN Et Al.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Jun 28, 1909.
Published
The hill in this case alleged that the plaintiff had been induced to execute a certain deed of conveyance in consequence of the fraud and undue influence practiced upon her and prayed that the same he annulled. The trial Court sustained a demurrer on the ground that the allegations of fraud, etc., in the hill were insufficient. This Court holds the allegations of the hill in this respect to he sufficient and remands the cause for further proceedings.