Mose Franklin Pearson v. United States, 563 F.2d 243 (5th Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
Mose Franklin Pearson v. United States, 563 F.2d 243 (5th Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mose Franklin PEARSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee
77-1705.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Nov 10, 1977.
563 F.2d 243
Mose Franklin Pearson, pro se., J. R. Brooks, U. S. Atty., James C. Thom-ason, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., for respondent-appellee.
Ainsworth, Morgan, Gee.
Published
PER CURIAM:

The precise questions raised by Pearson on this appeal from denial of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief regarding the constitutionality of the searches of his mail have been already litigated and determined adversely to his contentions on his direct appeal. 517 F.2d 350 (1975). We reject petitioner’s attempt to impose upon us such a “purposeless duplication of the review process.” See Blackwell v. United States, 429 F.2d 514, 516 (5th Cir. 1970).

AFFIRMED.