green
Positive treatment
18.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ewing v. United States
Ohio 2005) (citing Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir. 1977)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Byron Black v. Ricky Bell
(2×)
Although such after-the-fact evidence is relevant to competency determinations, “[t]he critical question is whether the evidence relied upon for determining a defendant’s competence at an earlier time of trial was evidence derived from knowledge contemporaneous to trial.” Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 4 (6th Cir.1977) (internal quotation marks omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Eley v. Bagley
(2×)
Retroactive determinations of competency are difficult, and any such determination must be based on "`evidence derived from knowledge contemporaneous to trial.'" Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 4 (6th Cir.1977) (quoting Conner v. Wingo, 429 F.2d 630, 637 (6th Cir.1970)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Paul Eugene Mason
See Renfroe, 825 F.2d at 767 ; Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 4 (6th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 436 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 2246 , 56 L.Ed.2d 409 (1978); United States v. Makris, 535 F.2d 899, 904 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 (1977). 9 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Stokes v. United States
(2×)
See Owen v. United States, 660 F.2d 696, 702 (6th Cir. 1981); Martin v. Estelle, 583 F.2d 1373, 1374 (5th Cir. 1978); Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 2246 , 56 L.Ed.2d 409 (1978); Bruce v. Estelle, 536 F.2d 1051 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1053 , 97 S.Ct. 767 , 50 L.Ed.2d 770 (1977); Martin v. United States, 463 F.2d 220, 221 (3d Cir. 1972); Johnston v. United States, 292 F.2d 51, 53 (10th Cir. 1961); Hayes v. United States, 468 F.Supp. 179, 184-85 (S.D.Tex.1979).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gilbert v. Commonwealth
Bowers v. Battles, C.A. 6th, 568 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1977); Harkins v. Wyrick, C.A. 8th, 552 F.2d 1308, 1311-1313 (1977); United States v. Makris, C.A. 5th, 535 F.2d 899, 904-905 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 954 , 97 S.Ct. 1598 , 51 L.Ed.2d 803 , rehearing denied, 431 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 1707 , 52 L.Ed.2d 394 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Goodrum
See Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 2246 , 56 L.Ed.2d 409 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Hilson v. United States
See Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 2246 , 56 L.Ed.2d 409 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Robinson v. United States
See Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 2246 , 56 L.Ed.2d 409 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas v. United States
See Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 910 , 98 S.Ct. 2246 , 56 L.Ed.2d 409 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Garnica v. United States
See Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir.1977); Mayes v. United States, 93 F.Supp.2d 882, 886 (E.D.Tenn.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Newton
See Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir. 1977) (adequacy of nunc pro tunc competency hearings dependent upon availability of contemporaneous evidence).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ricky Lee Newton
(2×)
See Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir.1977) (adequacy of nunc pro tunc competency hearings dependent upon availability of contemporaneous evidence).
cited
Cited "see"
Edwards v. United States
See Bowers v. Battles, 568 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir.1977); Mayes v. United States, 93 F.Supp.2d 882, 886 (E.D.Tenn.2000).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fotomat Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
See also, Baptist Memorial Hospital v. NLRB, 568 F.2d 1 (6th Cir. 1977); New England Medical Center Hospital v. NLRB, 548 F.2d 377 (1st Cir. 1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fotomat Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
See also, Baptist Memorial Hospital v. NLRB, 568 F.2d 1 (6th Cir. 1977); New England Medical Center Hospital v. NLRB, 548 F.2d 377 (1st Cir. 1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, John C. Miller, Acting General Counsel, Raymond A. Jacobson, Director Twenty-Sixth Region, Defendants-Appellees
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, John C. Miller, Acting General Counsel, Raymond A. Jacobson, Director Twenty-Sixth Region, Defendants-Appellees
76-1953.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Dec 21, 1977.
568 F.2d 1
John P. McCalla, Armstrong, Allen, Bra-den, Goodman, McBride & Prewitt, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellant., J. Pargen Robertson, John F. Harrington, N. L. R. B., Twenty Sixth Region, Memphis, Tenn., Charles Donnelly, Washington, D. C., for defendants-appellees.
Edwards, Celebrezze, Peck.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
ORDER
Appellant, The Baptist Memorial Hospital, appeals from an order of the District Court granting the motion of Appellee, National Labor Relations Board, for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant’s complaint which sought disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 as amended 88 Stat. 1561, of affidavits obtained during the investigation of unfair labor practice charges. The District Court found that the affidavits were exempt from disclosure.
On consideration of the briefs and oral arguments advanced in this appeal, the judgment of the District Court is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of this Court in NLRB v. Hardeman Garment Corp. and related cases therein. 557 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1977).
So ordered.