United States v. Virgil Redmond, 571 F.2d 513 (10th Cir. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Virgil Redmond, 571 F.2d 513 (10th Cir. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the district court has no power or authority to deviate from a mandate issued by the court of appeals.”
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Thompson v. Ford Motor Company
D. Colo. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the district court has no power or authority to deviate from a mandate issued by the court of appeals.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Weiker (2×)
S.D. · 1985 · signal: accord · confidence high
See United States v. Cato Bros., Inc., 273 F.2d 153, 157 (4th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 989 , 79 S.Ct. 1119 , 3 L.Ed.2d 978 (1959); accord, United States v. Redmond, 571 F.2d 513 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 995 , 98 S.Ct. 1645 , 56 L.Ed.2d 83 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Virgil REDMOND, Appellant
75-1767.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Apr 24, 1978.
571 F.2d 513
Richard J. Leedy, Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellant., Richard W. Beckler, Fraud Section, Crim. Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., Ronnie Edelman, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Seth, Lewis, Breitenstein.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 63%
Citer courts: D. Colorado (1)
PER CURIAM.

The motion of the defendant to designate a district judge to hear a petition to stay “imposition of sentence” is denied. This court has denied a motion to stay the mandate which was issued on January 5, 1978, and filed by the clerk of the district court on January 6, 1978. The district court has no power or authority to deviate from a mandate issued by the court of appeals. Briggs v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 334 U.S. 304, 306, 68 S.Ct. 1039, 92 L.Ed. 1403; see also Owensby v. Clark, 5 Cir., 451 F.2d 206, 208; United States v. Cato Brothers, Inc., 4 Cir., 273 F.2d 153, 157, and United States v. Ogilvie, 7 Cir., 360 F.2d 925, cert. denied 385 U.S. 938, 87 S.Ct. 304, 17 L.Ed.2d 218; cf. Vendo Co. v. Lecktro-Vend Corp., - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 702, 54 L.Ed.2d -, decided January 23, 1978.

The mandate requires that the appellant-defendant Redmond

“shall, within ten (10) days from and after the date of the filing of the mandate of this court in the district court, surrender himself to the custody of the United States Marshal for the District of Utah in execution of the judgment and sentence imposed upon him.”

The district court is without power or authority to extend the surrender time fixed by the mandate.

The provision of the mandate giving the district court discretionary power to “permit the appellant to surrender directly to the designated Bureau of Prisons institution for service of sentence” relates only to the place for surrender and does not authorize the district court to change the time for surrender.