green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berrier v. Simplicity Manufacturing, Inc.
See, e.g., Fedorchick v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 438 F.Supp. 60, 62-63 (E.D.Pa.1977), aff’d, 577 F.2d 725 (3d Cir.1978) (Table) ("[Section] 402A provides coverage for a person who suffers harm proximately caused by a defective and unreasonably dangerous product, regardless of whether that person used or consumed the product."); see also Stratos v. Super Sagless Corp., 1994 WL 709375 at *5 (E.D.Pa.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Mooney Aircraft Corp.
Compare Fedorchick v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 438 F.Supp. 60, 63 (E.D.Pa.1977), aff'd 577 F.2d 725 (3d Cir.1978) (“[W]e have no hesitancy in holding that Pennsylvania appellate courts, if faced with this issue, would extend § 402A’s coverage to innocent bystanders.”), and Herman v. Welland Chemical, Ltd., 580 F.Supp. 823, 829 (M.D.Pa.1984) (same), with Berrier v. Simplicity Corp., 413 F.Supp.2d 431, 439-42 (E.D.Pa.2005) (collecting cases and expressing doubt that Pennsylvania courts would permit bystanders to recover under a theory of strict liability).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Didio, in the Matter Of
77-2182.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 2, 1978.
577 F.2d 725
Published
DiDio, In the Matter of
No. 77-2182
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
5/2/78
1
E.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED