Atl. City Nat'l Bank v. Wilson, 154 A. 537 (N.J. 1931). · Go Syfert
Atl. City Nat'l Bank v. Wilson, 154 A. 537 (N.J. 1931). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ETC. VS. GWINN WALKER (F-038661-13, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (njsuperctappdiv, 2019-08-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ETC. VS. GWINN WALKER (F-038661-13, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2019 · confidence medium
It stands for the unremarkable proposition that following foreclosure of a junior encumbrance, the purchaser at sheriff's sale takes title subject to all encumbrances prior to the mortgage under which he obtained title and the mortgage foreclosed "wholly disappear[s] from the case." Wilson, 108 N.J.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. v. Montoya
N.M. Ct. App. · 2008 · confidence medium
Eq. 213 , 154 A. 537, 539 (1931) (holding that the sale vested “in the purchaser a legal right to the property free of incumbrances imposed upon it subsequent to the mortgage foreclosed, provided that the holders of such incumbrances are made parties to the foreclosure”); cf. W.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Lepore v. Ajamian
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1956 · confidence medium
Eq. 333 ( Ch. 1919); Atlantic City National Bank v. Wilson, 108 N.J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Atlantic City National Bank Et Al., Complainants,
v.
Andrew P. Wilson Et Al., Defendants; Atlantic City Lumber Company, Appellant
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Apr 24, 1931.
154 A. 537
On appeal from two orders of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, whose opinion is as follows:, Messrs. Thompson & Hanstein, for the appellant., Messrs. Bourgeois & Ooulomb, for the respondent.
Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells.
Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13. For reversal—None.