Kafton v. Wickberg, 3 A.2d 574 (N.J. 1939). · Go Syfert
Search
Kafton v. Wickberg, 3 A.2d 574 (N.J. 1939). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank Kafton, Respondent,
v.
Edward O. Wickberg Et Al., Appellants
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 13, 1939.
3 A.2d 574
For the appellants, John C. Stockel and R. Robinson Chance. For the respondent, David T. Wilentz , attorney-general.
PER CURIAM..
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Trenchard, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Walker, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.