green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joslin v. Lopez
A money judgment against the transferee may also be an available form of substitute relief where the transferee has disposed of the wrongfully conveyed property in some manner which makes it impossible to return (see Marine Midland Bank v Murkoff, supra; see also Wasey v Holbrook, 141 App Div 336 [1910], affd 206 NY 708 [1912]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marine Midland Bank v. Murkoff
A money judgment against the grantee is sometimes an available form of relief (see, Brown v Kimmel, 68 AD2d 896 ; see also, Halsey v Winant, 233 App Div 103 , revd on other grounds 258 NY 512 ), but because the defrauded creditor is not entitled to an enhancement of position beyond what it was before the fraud, such a judgment may be granted only where the grantee has disposed of the wrongfully conveyed property or depreciated it (Wasey v Holbrook, 141 App Div 336 , affd 206 NY 708 ; Mallouk v American Exch.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martin Schaefer, Respondent,
v.
John H. Hilliker Et Al., Appellants
v.
John H. Hilliker Et Al., Appellants
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 29, 1912.
John H. Steenwerth for appellants.
Lynn C. Norris and Francis X. Hennessy for Title Guarantee and Trust Company.
George L. Stamm for respondent.
Bartlett, Chase, Collin, Cullen, Haight, Hiscock, Vann, Willard.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellants on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.