green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Brock v. LaVallee
N.Y.Code Crim.Proc. § 342-a (McKinney 1958), as amended, (McKinney Supp.1969); see McDonald v. Sobel, 272 App.Div. 455 , 72 N.Y.S.2d 4 , aff'd, 297 N.Y. 679 , 77 N.E.2d 3 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
Koota v. Colombo
(Matter of Spector v. Allen, 281 N. Y. 251, 258 ; see Matter of Manning v. Valente, 272 App. Div. 358 , affd. 297 N. Y. 681 ; People v. Doe [Byk], 247 App. Div. 324 , affd. 272 N. Y. 473 ; Matter of Greenleaf v. Goldstein, 176 Misc. 566 , affd. 266 App. Div. 658 , affd. 291 N. Y. 690 .) However, although the court must be apprised of " the nature of the evidence demanded and of its relation to the subject of the investigation” (Matter of Spector v. Allen, 281 N. Y. 251, 258 , supra), the relevancy of the questions need not be conclusively established.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-General
(Matter of Dawn Operators v. Lyon, 283 App. Div. 358, 361 , motion for leave to appeal den. 306 N. Y. 977 ; see, also, Matter of Manning v. Valente, 297 N. Y. 681 , affg. 272 App. Div. 358 , 361.) And, upon a preliminary motion, such as the present, to contest “ the obligation of the writ ”, he need only show that the records and books which he seeks bear “ a reasonable relation to the subject-matter under investigation and to the public purpose to be achieved.” (Carlisle v. Bennett, 268 N. Y. 212,217 .) He does not, it is true, have “ arbitrary and unbridled discretion as to the sco…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Charles E. Manning, Appellant, Against Francis L. Valente, a Judge of the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 13, 1947.
Henry Epstein, Leo Kotler and Samuel Lawrence Brennglass
for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney ( Whitman Knapp, Richard G. Denzer, Eugene A. Leiman and Harold Roland Shapiro of counsel), for respondent.
Cited by 28 opinions | Published
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Teacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.