James Curran Mfg. Co. v. Aultman & Taylor Mach. Co., 65 N.E. 1118 (NY 1902). · Go Syfert
Search
James Curran Mfg. Co. v. Aultman & Taylor Mach. Co., 65 N.E. 1118 (NY 1902). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Myers v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins.
Tex. App. · 1925 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, the case of Te Bow v. Washington Life Insurance Co., 59 A.D. 310 , 69 N.Y.S. 289 , which was affirmed by the New York Court of Appeals in *Page 221 172 N.Y. 623 , 65 N.E. 1123 , wherein the court says: "A declaration that a policy had lapsed, and can be reinstated by furnishing a satisfactory medical certificate, imports of necessity a denial of the right to reinstatement except upon the condition named.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Curran Manufacturing Company, Respondent,
v.
the Aultman & Taylor MacHinery Company, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 28, 1902.
65 N.E. 1118
Augustus H. Van Buren for appellant. Warren C. Van Slyke and Charles W. Walton for respondent.
Published

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below.

Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Martin, J. Dissenting: Cullen, J. ,