Smith v. . New York, Chicago & St. Louis R.R. Co., 71 N.E. 1139 (NY 1904). · Go Syfert
Search
Smith v. . New York, Chicago & St. Louis R.R. Co., 71 N.E. 1139 (NY 1904). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Latham Lithographic Corporation (ca2, 1939-11-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Latham Lithographic Corporation
2d Cir. · 1939 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. Adams, 179 N.Y. 558 , 71 N.E. 1139 , affirming 81 App.Div. 20 , 80 N.Y.S. 1098 ; Hart v. Goadby, 138 App.Div. 160 , 123 N.Y.S. 166 ; Ettlinger v. Persian Rug & Carpet Co., 142 N.Y. 189 , 36 N.E. 1055 , 40 Am.St.Rep. 587 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albert E. Smith, Respondent,
v.
the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Company, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 3, 1904.
71 N.E. 1139
Louis L. Babcock for appellant. Tracy C. Becker for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.

Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Cray and O’Brien, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.