In Re the Arbitration Between Broadway-40th Street Corp. & President & Directors of Manhattan Co., 71 N.E.2d 451 (NY 1947). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re the Arbitration Between Broadway-40th Street Corp. & President & Directors of Manhattan Co., 71 N.E.2d 451 (NY 1947). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Anderson v. Nichols (wva, 1987-06-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Anderson v. Nichols
W. Va. · 1987 · confidence medium
Bean Const. Co. v. Middlebury Associates, 139 Vt. 200 , 428 A.2d 306 (1980); Librascope Inc., v. Precision Lodge No. 1600, 189 Cal.App.2d 71, 75 , 10 Cal.Rptr. 795, 797 (1961); In re Broadway 40th Street Corp., 296 N.Y. 165, 167 , 71 N.E.2d 451, 452 (1947).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Brandon v. Hines
D.C. · 1981 · confidence medium
Corp. v. Manhattan Co., 296 N.Y. 165, 167 , 71 N.E.2d 451, 452 (1947) (per curiam).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) R. E. Bean Construction Co. v. Middlebury Associates & Middlebury Developers, Inc.
Vt. · 1980 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Librascope, Inc. v. Precision Lodge No. 1600, 189 Cal. App. 2d 71, 75 , 10 Cal. Rptr. 795, 797 (1961); In re Broadway-40th Street Corp., 296 N.Y. 165, 167 , 71 N.E.2d 451, 452 (1947); Johnson v. Crawford, 212 Pa. 502, 505 , 61 A. 1103 (1905).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) RE Bean Const. v. MIDDLEBURY, ETC.
Vt. · 1980 · confidence medium
See, e. g., Librascope, Inc. v. Precision Lodge No. 1600, 189 Cal.App.2d 71, 75 , 10 Cal.Rptr. 795, 797 (1961); In re Broadway-40th Street Corp., 296 N.Y. 165, 167 , 71 N.E.2d 451, 452 (1947); Johnson v. Crawford, 212 Pa. 502, 505 , 61 A. 1103 (1905).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Brick Tp. Mun. Util. Auth. v. Diversified RB & T. Construction Co.
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1979 · confidence medium
Corp. v. President and Directors of Manhattan Co., 296 N.Y. 165 , 71 N.E. 2d 451, 452 (Ct.App. 1947) (holding that where no steps initiating arbitration where taken until after expiration of the dates specified in the agreement and there was no extension of time and no waiver, no valid award could be made and petitioner was not entitled to an order directing arbitration); Dickens v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Comm'n, 351 Pa. 252 , 40 A. 2d 421, 423 (Sup.Ct. 1945) (holding that where a provision in a turnpike construction contract that reference of question in dispute must be made within 30 days aft…
discussed Cited "see" Batson Yarn & Fabrics MacHinery Goup, Inc. v. Saurer-Allma GmbH-Allgauer Maschinenbau (2×)
D.S.C. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Broadway-Fortieth Street Corp. v. President and Directors of Manhattan Co. (1947) 296 N.Y. 165 , 71 N.E.2d 451 ; Dickens v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Comm. (1945) 351 Pa. 252 , 40 A.2d 421 ; Application of Trimount Clothing Co. (Sup.1952) 112 N.Y.S.2d 814 ; Publicists Local, etc. v. National Screen Service Corp. (1960) 183 Cal.App.2d 491 , 7 Cal.Rptr. 238 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Broadway-40th Street Corporation, Appellant, and President and Directors of Manhattan Company, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 16, 1947.
71 N.E.2d 451
Chester Rohrlich and I. Howard Lehman for appellant. Ralph H. Wiener and Henry L. Flattau for respondent.
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

Section 1460 of the Civil Practice Act provides that an arbitration award, to be entitled to enforcement under article 84 of the Civil Practice Act, must be subscribed by the arbitrators “ within the time limited in the submission or contract, if any ”. In the present case it is undisputed that no steps initiating arbitration were taken until after expiration of the dates specified in the lease provision for the making of the arbitration award, and there is no claim that the parties agreed to extend the time for rendering the award or that the objection was waived. No valid award could be made in such circumstances, and petitioner therefore is not entitled to an order directing arbitration (cf. Johnson v. Crawford, 212 Pa. 502; Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co., 143 F. 2d 1015; Sturges, Commercial Arbitrations and Awards, p. 523). We agree with the Appellate Division that section 1452 of the Civil Practice Act has no application where, as here, the contractual provisions for arbitration have expired by their own terms.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Loughean, Oh. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacheb, Dye and Fttld, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.