neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
Issue: time-honored testPA ↗
Issue: release of any claimNY ↗
1.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1935 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1935
1980
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Helen Palsgraf, Respondent,
v.
the Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant
v.
the Long Island Railroad Company, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Oct 9, 1928.
<italic>Per Curiam.</italic>.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
Motion for reargument.
If we assume that the plaintiff was nearer the scene of the explosion than the prevailing opinion would suggest, she was not so near that injury from a falling package, not known to contain explosives, would be within the range of reasonable prevision.
The motion should be denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur; Crane, Andrews and O’Brien, JJ., concur in result.