Nichols Charolais Ranch, Inc., Perry Nichols, Inez Nichols & Perry Nichols, Jr. v. Gerald C. Barton, Gerald C. Barton v. Nichols Charolais Ranch, Inc., Perry Nichols, Inez Nichols & Perry Nichols, Jr., 587 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Nichols Charolais Ranch, Inc., Perry Nichols, Inez Nichols & Perry Nichols, Jr. v. Gerald C. Barton, Gerald C. Barton v. Nichols Charolais Ranch, Inc., Perry Nichols, Inez Nichols & Perry Nichols, Jr., 587 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Deschler v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. (utah, 1983-04-27)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Deschler v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co. (2×)
Utah · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Childress v. Continental Casualty Co., 461 F. Supp. 704 (E.D.La. 1978), aff'd per curiam, 587 F.2d 809 (5th Cir.1979); Clark v. Lone Star Life Insurance Co., 347 S.W.2d 290 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jim Long v. Shultz Cattle Company, Incorporated, an Oklahoma Corporation, and William B. Shultz
5th Cir. · 1989 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Nichols Charolais Ranch, Inc. v. Barton, 460 F.Supp. 228 (M.D.Fla.1975), aff'd, 587 F.2d 809 (5th Cir.1979) (cattle-feeding contract was not investment contract where contract was not part of larger program and investor actively managed his cattle business). 8 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." John Deere Insurance Co. v. Penna
Minn. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Edison v. Reliable Life Insurance Co., 664 F.2d 1130 (9th Cir.1981) (device for aerial navigation) and Stajnrajh v. Continental Casualty Co., 41 Pa.D & C 2d 411 (1966) (degree of control indicates the parachute is a “device for aerial navigation”) with Childress v. Continental Casualty Co., 461 F.Supp. 704 , aff'd, 587 F.2d 809 (5th Cir.1978) (parachute is a device used to retard the speed of descent, not a device of aerial navigation) and Clark v. Lone Star Life Insurance Co., 347 S.W.2d 290 (Tex.Civ.App.1961) (not a device of aerial navigation).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nichols Charolais Ranch, Inc., Perry Nichols, Inez Nichols and Perry Nichols, Jr.
v.
Gerald C. Barton, Gerald C. Barton v. Nichols Charolais Ranch, Inc., Perry Nichols, Inez Nichols and Perry Nichols, Jr.
76-1788.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jan 10, 1979.
587 F.2d 809
Published

587 F.2d 809

NICHOLS CHAROLAIS RANCH, INC., Perry Nichols, Inez Nichols
and Perry Nichols, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Gerald C. BARTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Gerald C. BARTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NICHOLS CHAROLAIS RANCH, INC., Perry Nichols, Inez Nichols
and Perry Nichols, Jr., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 76-1788.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 10, 1979.

Robert W. Smith, Orlando, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Fletcher Brown, Arcadia, Fla., Perry Nichols, Arcadia, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before JONES, RONEY and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

These cases, consolidated in the district court, arise from nearly identical fact situations and are controlled by the same principles of law. The facts and the governing legal rules are well stated in the opinion of the district court. Nichols Charolais Ranch, Inc. v. Barton, 460 F.Supp. 228. The decision of the district court is correct and its judgment is

2

AFFIRMED.