United States v. Castaneda-Barrientos, 448 F.3d 731 (5th Cir. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Castaneda-Barrientos, 448 F.3d 731 (5th Cir. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Curry (ca5, 2025-01-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Curry
5th Cir. · 2025 · confidence medium
Moreover, at sentencing, Curry acknowledged that there were no pending objections to the PSR and _____________________ 16 United States v. Neal, 578 F.3d 270, 272 (5th Cir. 2009). 17 United States v. Nesmith, 866 F.3d 677, 679 (5th Cir. 2017) (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Garcia-Perez, 779 F.3d 278, 281-82 (5th Cir. 2015)). 18 United States v. Rodarte-Vasquez, 488 F.3d 316, 320 (5th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. Castaneda–Barrientos, 448 F.3d 731, 732 (5th Cir. 2006)). 6 Case: 22-11084 Document: 163-1 Page: 7 Date Filed: 01/13/20…
examined Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Rodarte-Vasquez (4×) also: Cited "see"
5th Cir. · 2007 · confidence medium
In contending Sanchez-Garcia has been abrogated, defendants rely on Castaneda-Barrientos, 448 F.3d at 731-32.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Juan Belen CASTANEDA-BARRIENTOS, Defendant-Appellant
03-51087.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 18, 2004.
448 F.3d 731
Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Judy Fulmer Madewell, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.
Higginbotham, Davis, Pickering.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Belen Castaneda-Barrientos concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.