Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 608 F.2d 1018 (5th Cir. 1979). · Go Syfert
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 608 F.2d 1018 (5th Cir. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Labor Relations Board v. Seaport Printing & AD Specialties, Inc. (ca5, 2009-12-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" National Labor Relations Board v. Seaport Printing & AD Specialties, Inc.
5th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See NLRB v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 601 F.2d 870, 874 (5th Cir.1979), panel reh’g granted on other grounds, 608 F.2d 1018 (5th Cir.1979) (“As a general rule, an employer that refuses to bargain on the ground that an election is invalid does so at its peril; if the election challenge were to prove fruitless, an order by the Board based on the refusal to bargain would be enforced.”).
cited Cited "see" Aaron Brothers Company, a Division of Chromalloy American Corp., Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See NLRB v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 601 F.2d 870, 875 (5th Cir. 1979), modified, 608 F.2d 1018 (5th Cir. 1979) (sole issue whether union properly certified).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION, Respondent
78-1742, 78-3322.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 26, 1979.
608 F.2d 1018
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate, Gen. Counsel, Joseph Oertel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner in both cases., Jolly, Miller & Milam, E. Grady Jolly, James R. Lockard, Jackson, Miss., for respondent in both cases., Lynn Agee, Memphis, Tenn., for Int’l Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America., John G. Elligers, Supervisor, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner in No. 78-3322.
Thornberry, Goldberg, Gee.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Reporter's Syllabus — editorial summary, not part of the Court's opinion

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate, Gen. Counsel, Joseph Oertel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner in both cases.

Jolly, Miller & Milam, E. Grady Jolly, James R. Lockard, Jackson, Miss., for respondent in both cases.

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In our original decision in this case, we enforced the Board’s order in part and remanded on the issue of back pay. On petition for rehearing, Allis-Chalmers has raised some question of the accuracy of our conclusion that the Board found that corrections by the Union aided in dissipating the Union misstatement concerning the Board action in the Cook firing.

Pursuant to our request in accordance with FRAP Rule 40, the Board has filed a response to the petition for rehearing. After due consideration of the petition and response and a review of the record, we have doubts whether our conclusion was justified. In light of the crucial part this conclusion played in our reconciliation of the Board’s action in this case and its decision in Formco, Inc., 233 N.L.R.B. 61 (1977), we now believe it is best to remand that part of the Board’s decision dealing with the Cook misstatement by the Union, for the Board to clarify the basis of its decision, especially in relation to Formco. During the remand, enforcement of the Board’s order will be stayed.

In all other respects the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

No member of this panel or Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

ENFORCEMENT STAYED; REMANDED IN PART.

Concurrence

GEE, Circuit Judge,

concurring:

I concur in the opinion on rehearing and withdraw the last full paragraph of my special concurrence in the original majority opinion. 5 Cir., 601 F.2d 870, 876. See Home Town Foods, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., 416 F.2d 392, 399 (5th Cir. 1969).