Barry L. Battelstein & Jerry E. Battelstein v. Internal Revenue Serv., 616 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Barry L. Battelstein & Jerry E. Battelstein v. Internal Revenue Serv., 616 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Patrick R. Rizzo v. United States (ca7, 1987-06-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Patrick R. Rizzo v. United States
7th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mixon v. United States, 608 F.2d 588 (5th Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 616 F.2d 253 (5th Cir.1980). *1273 The language of Rule 9(a) seems to envision that before the doctrine of laches may be applied to section 2255 motions, the delay must have been inexcusable and must have prejudiced the government.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barry L. BATTELSTEIN and Jerry E. Battelstein, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellant
77-3212.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 11, 1980.
616 F.2d 253
M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert E. Andrews, Act. Chief, Appellate Section, Robert A. Bernstein, Atty., Gayle P. Miller, William Friedlander, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellant., Marc E. Grossberg, David Cowan, Hugh M. Ray, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Coleman, Brown, Ainsworth, Godbold, Clark, Roney, Gee, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Rubin, Vance, Kravitch, Johnson, Garza, Henderson, Reavley, Pol-Itz, Hatchett, Anderson, Randall, Tate.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.