Maida v. Tel. Traffic Union, Afl-Cio, 620 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Maida v. Tel. Traffic Union, Afl-Cio, 620 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. New York (nynd, 2002-03-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. New York
N.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida, 70-CV-35, June 17, 1979 Order at 4 (finding that the Oneida Plaintiffs adequately represented the Marble Hill Oneidas’ individual interest in the action), aff'd 620 F.2d 285 (2d Cir.1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Maida
v.
Telephone Traffic Union, Afl-Cio
79-7533.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 7, 1980.
620 F.2d 285
Published

620 F.2d 285

Maida
v.
Telephone Traffic Union, AFL-CIO

79-7533

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit

2/7/80

1

S.D.N.Y.

2

AFFIRMED[*]

*

Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23