United States v. Smith, 624 F.2d 1092 (3rd Cir. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Smith, 624 F.2d 1092 (3rd Cir. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“litigant may not ... avoid the statute of limitations simply because the decision it forces him to make - whether to pursue legal remedies before all avenues of informal settlement are exhausted - is a difficult one”
53 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sanders v. Duke University (ncmd, 1982-05-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Sanders v. Duke University
M.D.N.C. · 1982 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
litigant may not ... avoid the statute of limitations simply because the decision it forces him to make - whether to pursue legal remedies before all avenues of informal settlement are exhausted - is a difficult one
cited Cited "see" Smith v. Douglas Cable Communications
D. Kan. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, Wagner v. Sperry Univan, 458 F.Supp. 505, 520-21 (E.D.Pa.1978) aff'd, 624 F.2d 1092 (3d Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see" Woolley v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.
N.J. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wagner v. Sperry Univac, Div. of Sperry Rand Corp., 458 F.Supp. 505 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff’d, 624 F.2d 1092 (3d Cir.1980); Leikvold v. Valley View Community Hosp., 141 Ariz. 544 , 688 P.2d 170 (1984) (en banc); Pugh v. See’s Candies, Inc., 116 Cal.App.3d 311 , 171 Cal.Rptr. 917 (1981); Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mich., supra, 408 Mich. 579 , 292 N.W 2d 880; Pine River State Bank v. Mettille, supra, 333 N.W. 2d 622 ; Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 57 N.Y.2d 458 , 457 N.Y.S.2d 193 , 443 N.E. 2d 441 (1982); Thompson v. St.
discussed Cited "see" Moore v. Mobil Oil Co. (2×)
Pa. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Walker v. O’Bannon, 487 F.Supp. 1151 (W.D.Pa.1980), affirmed 624 F.2d 1092 (3rd Cir.) (1980).
cited Cited "see" Harold R. PRICE, Appellant, v. LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee
4th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wagner v. Sperry Univac, 458 F.Supp. 505, 516 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff’d mem., 624 F.2d 1092 (3d Cir.1980).
cited Cited "see" Naus & Newlyn, Inc. v. Mason
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Walker v. O’Bannon, 487 F.Supp. 1151 (W.D.Pa.1980), affirmed 624 F.2d 1092 (3rd Cir.) (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Blount v. Shalala
D. Maryland · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Wagner v. Sperry Univac, 458 F.Supp. 505, 516 (E.D.Pa.1978), affd, 624 F.2d 1092 (3rd Cir.1980) (“(a) litigant may not ... avoid the statute of limitations simply because the decision it forces him to make— whether to pursue legal remedies before all avenues of informal settlement are exhausted—is a difficult one”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wells v. Thomas
E.D. Pa. · 1983 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Wagner v. Sperry Univac, Div. of Sperry Rand Corp., 458 F.Supp. 505 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff’d, 624 F.2d 1092 (3d Cir.1980) (evidence sufficient to preclude entry of summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim for breach of employment contract).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Smith
80-1203.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jul 8, 1980.
624 F.2d 1092
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 85%
Citer courts: M.D. North Carolina (1)

624 F.2d 1092

U. S.
v.
Smith

80-1203

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit

7/8/80

1

E.D.Pa.

AFFIRMED