neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.3 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David L. SHEPARD, Jr., Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BEAIRD-POULAN, INC., Defendant-Appellee
v.
BEAIRD-POULAN, INC., Defendant-Appellee
76-4229.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 2, 1981.
Robert E. Piper, Jr., Frank E. Brown, Jr., Shreveport, La., for plaintiffs-appellants., Walter W. Christy, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.
Gee, Hatchett, Per Curiam, Thornberry.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
PER CURIAM:
In light of intervening decisions, including Satterwhite v. City of Greenville, 5th Cir. 1981, 634 F.2d 231, (En Banc Decision on Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States); Armour v. City of Anniston, 622 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1980) (On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States), the case is remanded to the district court to determine whether there exists a live controversy involving the proposed class; if so, whether Mr. Shepard is a proper class representative; if not, whether an appropriate class representative wishes to be appointed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.