green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lee
Cir. 2023) (upholding two-night curfew “in response to a spike in serious crime” as a valid time, place, and manner restriction); see also Sanders v. United States, 518 F. Supp. 728, 729 (D.D.C. 1981), aff’d, 679 F.2d 262 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Invisible Empire of Knights of Ku Klux Klan v. Mayor, Board of Commissioners
See, e.g., Sanders v. United States, 518 F.Supp. 728, 730 (D.D.C.1981), aff'd 679 F.2d 262 (D.C.Cir.1982) (discussing the fundamental interest in “guaranteeing citizens .the right to participate in events or demonstrations of their own choosing without being subjected to interference by other citizens.”); the facts in Gay Veteran Association, Inc. v. American Legion, 621 F.Supp. 1510 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (aff’d by the Second Circuit orally from the bench Nov. 8, 1985, without written decision).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kroll v. United States Capitol Police
They concluded that “the primary purpose for which the Capitol was designed — legislating—[is not] incompatible. with the existence of all parades, assemblages, or processions which may take place on the grounds.” Id. at 584 ; see also Dellums v. Powell, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 275 , 566 F.2d 167 (1977), cert, denied, 438 U.S. 916 , 98 S.Ct. 3146 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1161 (1978) (“Dellums F).- Two recent cases, Heffron v. ISKON, supra, and Sanders v. United States, 518 F.Supp. 728 (D.D.C. 1981), aff'd mem., 679 F.2d 262 (D.C.Cir. 1982), illuminate the importance of investigating the attributes of t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Anderson
v.
Anderson
81-2273.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
May 11, 1982.
Published
U. S.
v.
Anderson
81-2273
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit
5/11/82
1
D.C.D.C.
AFFIRMED
2
---------------
* The judgment or order is accompanied by a Memorandum explanatory of the judgment. Such memorandum is not included with the opinions of the Court that are printed, and it may not be cited in briefs or memoranda of counsel as precedents, under local rule.