neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.4 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
M. B. Armstrong Music Co.
v.
Polk
v.
Polk
14207.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Sep 25, 1923.
Ames, Lowe & Richardson and H.M. Carr, for plaintiff in error., M. Henderson, for defendant in error.
Cochran.
Published
COCHRAN, J.
Plaintiff in error filed its brief herein on July 20, 1923. No brief has been filed by defendant in error and no extension of time given to file same and no reason assigned why brief has not been filed, tinder the rule of this court, when the brief of plaintiff in error appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, this court will not search the record to find some theory upon which judgment may be sustained. Following this rule, the judgment of the trial court in this cause is reversed, and cause remanded, with directions to grant a new trial.
All the Justices concur.