Calvin Louis Anderson Bey v. United States, 683 F.2d 1218 (8th Cir. 1982). · Go Syfert
Calvin Louis Anderson Bey v. United States, 683 F.2d 1218 (8th Cir. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Calvin Louis Anderson BEY, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
82-1253.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Aug 17, 1982.
683 F.2d 1218
Thomas E. Dittmeier, U. S. Atty., Edward L. Dowd, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee., Calvin Louis Anderson Bey, pro se.
Bright, Gibson, John, McMILLIAN, Per Curiam.
Published
PER CURIAM.

Calvin Louis Anderson Bey, pro se, appeals from the district court’s [1] order dismissing his petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On appeal appellant contends his original sentence should be overturned because it had been based on erroneous information contained in a presentence investigative report and because he had not received effective legal assistance at the sentencing hearing.

We have carefully examined the record and briefs in this matter and find no merit in appellant’s contentions. Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 12(a).

1

. The Honorable H. Kenneth Wangelin, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.