green
Positive treatment
1.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joel Popkin & Co. v. Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates, Inc.
In essence, the parties disagree over the meaning of the term “required”: Wharton claims that it means “required by Wharton,” and JPC claims that it means “required by the Agreement.” As both parties recognize, “a contract must be construed as a whole, and the intention of the parties ... collected from the entire instrument and not from detached portions, it being necessary to consider all of its parts in order to determine the meaning of any particular part as well as of the whole.” Mowry v. McWherter, 365 Pa. 232 , 74 A.2d 154, 158 (1950) (emphasis in original); see also The…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Gaziano
v.
Gaziano
81-2681.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 11, 1982.
688 F.2d 825
Published
U. S.
v.
Gaziano
81-2681, 81-2682, 81-2683
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
5/11/82
1
W.D.Pa.
AFFIRMED