Mack A. Wilson v. The Florida Bd. of Regents Florida a & M Univ., Walter L. Johnson Charles C. Kidd, Gertrude Simmons & Walter L. Smith, 694 F.2d 239 (11th Cir. 1982). · Go Syfert
Search
Mack A. Wilson v. The Florida Bd. of Regents Florida a & M Univ., Walter L. Johnson Charles C. Kidd, Gertrude Simmons & Walter L. Smith, 694 F.2d 239 (11th Cir. 1982). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Meeker v. Addison (flsd, 1984-07-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Meeker v. Addison
S.D. Fla. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
Compare Patsy v. Bd. of Regents of State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982) and McNeese v. Bd. of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963), with Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527 , 101 S.Ct. 1908 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); see also Wilson v. Bd. of Regents, 694 F.2d 239 (11th Cir.1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MacK A. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
the FLORIDA BOARD OF REGENTS; Florida a & M University, Walter L. Johnson; Charles C. Kidd, Gertrude Simmons & Walter L. Smith, Defendants-Appellees
82-5429.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Dec 20, 1982.
694 F.2d 239
Woods, Johnston & Carlson, John D. Carlson, Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant., Bruce A. Minnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for defendants-appellees.
Roney, Vance, Anderson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The district court, relying on our decision in Patsy v. Florida International University, 634 F.2d 900 (5th Cir.1981), dismissed appellant’s complaint because it did not sufficiently allege exhaustion or inadequacy of administrative remedies. Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court, reversing our decision in Patsy, held that exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not a prerequisite to an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of Florida, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2557, 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). In light of the Supreme Court’s ruling, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.