Potts (Ronnie M.) v. Schweiker (Richard S.), 729 F.2d 1462 (6th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Potts (Ronnie M.) v. Schweiker (Richard S.), 729 F.2d 1462 (6th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Winback & Conserve Program, Inc. (ca3, 1994-12-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Winback & Conserve Program, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
Roberts v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc., 729 F.2d 1462 at *3 (6th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
As the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has explained: 79 If the principal is responsible for the third person believing that the person with whom she deals is an agent, or if the principal should realize that his conduct is likely to induce such belief, then there is an agency created by apparent authority and the principal will be held responsible for the torts of his agent. 80 Roberts v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc., 729 F.2d 1462 at * 3 (6th Cir.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Potts (Ronnie M.)
v.
Schweiker (Richard S.)
83-3195.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 10, 1984.
729 F.2d 1462
Published

729 F.2d 1462

Potts (Ronnie M.)
v.
Schweiker (Richard S.)

NO. 83-3195

United States Court of Appeals,
sixth Circuit.

FEB 10, 1984

Appeal From: S.D.Ohio

1

AFFIRMED.