Vaughan v. Cent. Bk. Of South, 741 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Vaughan v. Cent. Bk. Of South, 741 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Wiencko (vawb, 2007-07-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In Re Wiencko
Bankr. W.D. Va. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vaughan v. Central Bank of the South (In re Vaughan), 36 B.R. 935, 938 (N.D.Ala.1984), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir.1984) (recognizing difference between disputed and unliquidated).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Verdunn
11th Cir. · 1996 · signal: accord · confidence high
Knight, 55 F.3d at 235 ; In re Jordan, 166 B.R. 201, 202 (Bankr.D.Me.1994) (`T1']he vast majority of courts have held that the existence of a dispute over either the underlying liability or the amount of a debt does not automatically render the debt either contingent or unliquidated."); accord Vaughan v. Central Bank of the South, 36 B.R. 935, 938 (N.D.Ala.), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir.1984); see also Norton, supra, at 18-48 ("If the amount of a claim has been ascertained or can readily be calculated, it is liquidated-whether contested or not."). 10 .
discussed Cited "see" Nicholes v. Johnny Appleseed of Washington (In Re Nicholes)
9th Cir. BAP · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Vaughan, 36 B.R. 935, 938 (N.DAla. 1984), aff'd, 741 F.2d 1383 (11th Cir.1984). *90 The second view, a more rigid approach to Chapter 13 eligibility, holds that a dispute over liability or amount does not render a debt unliquidated.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vaughan
v.
Central Bk. Of South
84-7122.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 15, 1984.
741 F.2d 1383
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

741 F.2d 1383

*Vaughan
v.
Central Bk. of South

84-7122

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

8/15/84

N.D.Ala., 36 B.R. 935

AFFIRMED

1

---------------

* Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 23.