Julian Reid Gabbard v. Robert F. Stephens & Drexell R. Davis, 745 F.2d 1044 (6th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Julian Reid Gabbard v. Robert F. Stephens & Drexell R. Davis, 745 F.2d 1044 (6th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Heller v. Ross (mied, 2010-01-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Heller v. Ross (2×) also: Cited "see"
E.D. Mich. · 2010 · confidence medium
Plaintiff further urges the Court to distinguish the present case from the Sixth Circuit’s 1984 holding in Darks v. Cincinnati See 745 F.2d at 1044.
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Jeffrey Scott Alpert
4th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
Moya v. United States, 745 F.2d 1044, 1050 (7th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cesar Moya v. United States (2×)
7th Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
The majority initially held that “the government waived its claims that the officers had probable cause and that the seizure of the clear plastic bag fits within the 'plain view' exception to the warrant requirement.” United States v. Moya, 745 F.2d 1044, 1048 (7th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Eutues White v. Fred Finkbeiner (2×)
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Moya, 745 F.2d at 1047-1048 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Julian Reid GABBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert F. STEPHENS and Drexell R. Davis, Defendants-Appellees
84-5814.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 10, 1984.
745 F.2d 1044
Edwards.
Published

ORDER

Before EDWARDS, JONES and WELL-FORD, Circuit Judges.

On receipt and consideration of an appeal in the above-styled case from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky at Frankfort; and having granted a motion for accelerated briefing and hearing in said case on recommendations of time issues of an emergency nature; and having received and considered said briefs; and the court having heard full oral argument on the case, and finding no fact or law which warrant this court’s intervention in the State of Kentucky’s electoral process for justice of its Supreme Court; we therefore affirm the decision of the District Judge who dismissed the federal claims advanced by appellant for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and thereupon declined to hear the state claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Snowden v. Hughes, 321 U.S. 1, 64 S.Ct. 397, 88 L.Ed. 497 (1944).