green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Claus
See, United States v. Kapperman, 764 F.2d 786, 794 (11th Cir. 1985), reh’g denied 770 F.2d 1084 (consent to search automobile and remove “ ‘whatever documents or items of property whatsoever, which they deem pertinent to the investigation,’ ” authorized police to search unlocked suitcase in automobile, “ ‘as documents or other items of property cannot necessarily be expected to be lying loose in an automobile’ ”); U.S. v. Anderson, 859 F.2d 1171, 1176 (3d Cir. 1988) (where defendant consented to search of automobile for “ ‘any letters[,] documents, papers, materials or ot…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Prahin
See, United States v. Kapperman, 764 F.2d 786, 794 (11th Cir. 1985), reh’g denied 770 F.2d 1084 (consent to search automobile and remove “ ‘whatever documents or items of property whatsoever, which they deem pertinent to the investigation, ’ ” authorized police to search unlocked suitcase in automobile, “as documents or other items of property cannot necessarily be expected to be lying loose in an automobile”); U.S. v. Anderson, 859 F.2d 1171, 1176 (3d Cir. 1988) (where defendant consented to search of automobile for “ ‘any letters[,] documents, papers, materials or other pro…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charlie Clarence King
See United States v. Kapperman, 764 F.2d 786 , 790 n. 4, reh’g denied, 770 F.2d 1084 (11th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Gaither
See, Griffin v. Wainwright, 760 F.2d 1505 (11th Cir.), reh. denied, 765 F.2d 1123 (11th Cir.) and 770 F.2d 1084 (11th Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barber v. Guay
While several cases have relied heavily on the restraint issue, in United States v. Quinn, the First Circuit held that restriction of movement alone does not transform a Terry stop into a de facto arrest. 815 F.2d at 156-58 ; see also United States v. Kapperman, 764 F.2d 786 , 791 n. 4 (“[N]either handcuffing nor other restraints will automatically *799 convert a Terry stop into a de facto arrest requiring probable cause.”), reh’g denied, 770 F.2d 1084 (11th Cir.1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joshi
v.
Florida State University Health Center
v.
Florida State University Health Center
84-3387.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Aug 7, 1985.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Joshi
v.
Florida State University Health Center
84-3387
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
8/7/85
N.D.Fla., 763 F.2d 1227